probchief
LER member1
Charter Member
Posts: 164
|
Post by probchief on Oct 24, 2008 19:49:47 GMT -5
Obviously the City Council thought so, what about you?
|
|
|
|
Post by 1underk on Oct 24, 2008 22:41:00 GMT -5
In a word, NO!
|
|
|
|
Post by bvillewifey on Oct 24, 2008 23:09:52 GMT -5
I hope that everyone looked to see how their council rep voted and if they participated in this travesty of democracy, remember to put foot to a$$ and kick them out of their cushy seats in next year's election.
|
|
airborneguy
LER member level 2
^^^^ Charter Member
De Oppresso Liber
Posts: 810
|
Post by airborneguy on Oct 25, 2008 0:16:13 GMT -5
Agree with above... this is a miscarriage, period. If the voters give him a THIRD term, it will be an embarrassment for years to come. BUT, it we defeat him and prove a point, it will be a BOLD statement of the values of REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT in the mold of the Revolutionary Era.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2008 8:47:36 GMT -5
Agreed! There should be a choice in the poll for, "No f@#$ing way" I was hoping that Charles Barron had voted against term limits just so I could hate him more but unfortunately not. Who's disgraceful now, Mr. Mayor? |
|
|
|
Post by truck11 on Oct 27, 2008 0:30:13 GMT -5
no.
|
|
nzmike11
LER member1
Charter Member
Posts: 699
|
Post by nzmike11 on Oct 31, 2008 17:20:43 GMT -5
Absolutely not. NO politican should serve more than two terms. Take a look at doddering, old Sen. Byrd (WVA). Moses lets him cut line at buffets. Two terms and out ya go!
|
|
Bugsey
LER member level 3
^^^^
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.
Posts: 1,299
|
Post by Bugsey on Nov 1, 2008 11:03:31 GMT -5
One word........NO!
|
|
|
|
Post by Scamming with the Best on Nov 1, 2008 13:30:48 GMT -5
Obviously the City Council thought so, what about you? the only reason they thought so is because there term can be extended as well since most of them are out. It's a joke if you ask me. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2008 13:49:53 GMT -5
Obviously the City Council thought so, what about you? the only reason they thought so is because there term can be extended as well since most of them are out. It's a joke if you ask me. Absolutely. That and the fact that Bloomberg actually bribed them by funding 'pork' in their individual districts. He didn't even have the courtesy to do it with his own money. He used our money to do it! Talk about irony. |
|
|
|
Post by Scamming with the Best on Nov 1, 2008 14:03:03 GMT -5
the only reason they thought so is because there term can be extended as well since most of them are out. It's a joke if you ask me. Absolutely. That and the fact that Bloomberg actually bribed them by funding 'pork' in their individual districts. He didn't even have the courtesy to do it with his own money. He used our money to do it! Talk about irony. The people voted to have term limits and now you have the city council members voting to extend it without a vote from the public? thats wrong but then again what is right with the city anyways! |
|
