terry33
LER member level 6
Posts: 3,255 
|
Post by terry33 on Jan 8, 2019 0:13:43 GMT -5
Notice how animated Dershowitz got when the anchor asked him about this. He was jumping out of his seat - because he knows it's true. If there were emails that exonerated him there is nothing on earth that would keep him from revealing them. What kind of court action would prevent their release? If there was some court file under seal for some unimaginable reason, he could move the court to release them - but he hasnt. He has been accused of being a pedofile. There is nothing worse. He would have every right to reveal those emails to rebut thar very damning charge -but he hasnt- because they dont exist. He's just waiting for his big bucks buddy Epstein to pay of these women so he can get a letter of 'exoneration' from them. Also, why would these women accuse the most famous lawyer in America of such a charge, if it wasnt true. If they were going to make up charges, Dont you think they would pick a less formidable adversary? How about an ongoing Grand Jury? It could also be part of a lawsuit that Dershowitz is a part of with Epstein and the judge put a gag order on until it is over or settled. It could be the Weiner laptop. Do you know of a grand jury investigating this? No. Did Dershowitz say that there is such a grand jury? No. Is it against the law to say there is a grand jury? No. So why not stick to the facts rather than spin these fantastical yarns of yours? Gag order? What gag order? A gag order is a public court order. Do you know of one? Did Dershowitz refer to one? No. More fantasies. Weiner laptop. Any evidence this matter is mentioned on there? Zilch. Maybe Assange's got these secret emails, right? Yeah, that's where they are - no doubt about it! |
|
|
|
Post by meznoktoz on Jan 8, 2019 5:37:42 GMT -5
How anyone who called themselves an "investigator" can review ALL this material and not see anything is troubling to me. Review the Wikileaked emails, Epstein, Haiti, Podesta,Seth Rich,etc etc Thankfully others are and keeping it alive while the media buries it for their sick twisted masters ![]()  Rich was believed to have a bright future in Democratic politics when he was shot twice in the back in the early morning hours of July 10, 2016 near his Washington, DC apartment. Couch and a Republican lobbyist, radio host and attorney, Jack Burkman, were originally working separately, with Couch having engaged former FBI agents and NYPD Retired Sgt Frank Whalen expertise to investigate the unsolved murder, and Burkman operating The Profiling Project, a volunteer group tasked to assemble a profile of Rich’s killer or killers. |
|
|
|
Post by dustoff262 on Jan 8, 2019 7:05:26 GMT -5
So this billionaire pedophile, with high profile clients, with security teams, private jets, political guests doesn't have a single surveillance video or photo proof of who is coming and going as a get out of jail free card?
Seems to me that there is someone who can provide this evidence with a clear conscience.
That would be the smoking gun. Not the what ifs, i heard that, this dead guy could have, the nypd saw this on a laptop, etc.
A lot of guessing, conjecture and conspiracies. I bet Hannity would love to show the evidence on live TV, unless HE happens to be in a video himself.(See, anyone can say anything in this age of social media and gain traction)
|
|
|
|
Post by meznoktoz on Jan 8, 2019 8:43:32 GMT -5
So this billionaire pedophile, with high profile clients, with security teams, private jets, political guests doesn't have a single surveillance video or photo proof of who is coming and going as a get out of jail free card? Seems to me that there is someone who can provide this evidence with a clear conscience. That would be the smoking gun. Not the what ifs, i heard that, this dead guy could have, the nypd saw this on a laptop, etc. A lot of guessing, conjecture and conspiracies. I bet Hannity would love to show the evidence on live TV, unless HE happens to be in a video himself.(See, anyone can say anything in this age of social media and gain traction) My thoughts too. He has to have cameras and video of his high profile guests as a get out of jail free card. My hope is wikileaks or a hacker obtains them. The life insurance folder on the Weiners laptop was his insurance, hopefully we learn exactly what was in it. The story that leaked out after it was seized by the NYPD was very disturbing |
|
Elmo334
LER member level 3
home
Posts: 1,329
|
Post by Elmo334 on Jan 8, 2019 10:10:27 GMT -5
How about an ongoing Grand Jury? It could also be part of a lawsuit that Dershowitz is a part of with Epstein and the judge put a gag order on until it is over or settled. It could be the Weiner laptop. Do you know of a grand jury investigating this? No. Did Dershowitz say that there is such a grand jury? No. Is it against the law to say there is a grand jury? No. So why not stick to the facts rather than spin these fantastical yarns of yours? Gag order? What gag order? A gag order is a public court order. Do you know of one? Did Dershowitz refer to one? No. More fantasies. Weiner laptop. Any evidence this matter is mentioned on there? Zilch. Maybe Assange's got these secret emails, right? Yeah, that's where they are - no doubt about it! In my post I suggested some possible reasons for him not being able to produce the emails he spoke of but I never stated anything as fact. It seems the emails are part of a lawsuit Epstien settled and the records are sealed. Dope. www.google.com/amp/s/amp.miamiherald.com/latest-news/article223315075.html |
|
terry33
LER member level 6
Posts: 3,255
|
Post by terry33 on Jan 8, 2019 13:26:01 GMT -5
Do you know of a grand jury investigating this? No. Did Dershowitz say that there is such a grand jury? No. Is it against the law to say there is a grand jury? No. So why not stick to the facts rather than spin these fantastical yarns of yours? Gag order? What gag order? A gag order is a public court order. Do you know of one? Did Dershowitz refer to one? No. More fantasies. Weiner laptop. Any evidence this matter is mentioned on there? Zilch. Maybe Assange's got these secret emails, right? Yeah, that's where they are - no doubt about it! In my post I suggested some possible reasons for him not being able to produce the emails he spoke of but I never stated anything as fact. It seems the emails are part of a lawsuit Epstien settled and the records are sealed. Dope. www.google.com/amp/s/amp.miamiherald.com/latest-news/article223315075.htmlIf Dershowitz is not a pedofile why did he pay $900,000 to the girl's attorneys after Dershowitz claimed the pedofile charges they made against him were false and the attys sued him for defamation?? Gee, you would think Dershowitz would have used those 'conclusive emails' to defend himself. And why do you think the case is sealed - because Dershowitz's long time friend and co-pedofile Epstein, wants it sealed - to protect himself and Dershowitz. The girl, according to your own article has agreed to the unsealing. By the way, we're still waiting for those THOUSANDS of indictments Huber brought against the Deep State actors, that you endlessly proclaimed. You said they also were 'under seal'. How convenient. LOL. 'Roberts, who now lives in Australia, said that Epstein ordered her to have sex with Dershowitz six times, according to a 2015 affidavit, which was filed in connection with an unrelated Epstein federal lawsuit. At that time, Dershowitz launched a media blitz on TV asserting that Roberts made up the story. He also called for Roberts’ lawyers — Edwards and University of Utah law professor Paul Cassell — to be disbarred. The lawyers sued Dershowitz for defamation, and the case was settled last year. Dershowitz publicly declared he was vindicated after a federal judge ordered Roberts’ affidavit stricken from the court record. But the judge did not address the veracity of her sexual misconduct claims; he instead ruled that the affidavit was misplaced in a case not involving Dershowitz. Boies, whose firm represented Roberts pro bono, addressed Dershowitz’s longstanding contention that he had been exonerated. “Anytime in a lawsuit where you were the defendant and you paid the plaintiff $900,000 to settle it — that’s a strange kind of vindication,’’ Boies said, asserting that Dershowitz paid that amount as part of the defamation settlement with Edwards and Cassell.' |
|
Elmo334
LER member level 3
home
Posts: 1,329
|
Post by Elmo334 on Jan 8, 2019 13:48:34 GMT -5
Terry: If Dershowitz is not a pedofile why did he pay $900,000 to the girl's attorneys after Dershowitz claimed the pedofile charges they made against him were false and the attys sued him for defamation?? Gee, you would think Dershowitz would have used those 'conclusive emails' to defend himself. And why do you think the case is sealed - because Dershowitz's long time friend and co-pedofile Epstein, wants it sealed - to protect himself and Dershowitz. The girl, according to your own article has agreed to the unsealing. By the way, we're still waiting for those THOUSANDS of indictments Huber brought against the Deep State actors, that you endlessly proclaimed. You said they also were 'under seal'. How convenient. LOL. Dershowitz, in interviews with the Herald, and in recent public statements, said he has never met Ransome. He also said she initially tried to interest the New York Post in her story, but a reporter whom he said he spoke with told him Ransome was not credible. He said he has a trove of emails between Ransome and the reporter that prove she is a “lunatic.’’
“There are hundreds of emails in which she claimed to have sex with everybody in the world and also claimed she has video of Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Donald Trump and others having sex with underage girls — but she never ever accused me in these emails,’’ Dershowitz said.The emails are under seal, he said, and therefore cannot be made public. Dershowitz said he has asked the court to unseal them but his efforts thus far have been unsuccessful.Read more here: www.miamiherald.com/latest-news/article223315075.html#storylink=cpyI don't know if Dershowitz had sex with the girl or not and I don't know what's in the emails and neither do you. It seems Dershowitz wasn't in possession of them to do anything with them and the court has them and sealed them. If they think he did have sex with the minor why didn't they prosecute? Several lawmakers have also asked the FBI to investigate the ridiculous plea deal that was given to Epstien to see if he paid for a lenient sentence. As for the thousands of sealed indictments in the Federal system they are still there and still sealed, so time will tell. Up to 73K. docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kVQwX9l9HJ5F76x05ic_YnU_Z5yiVS96LbzAOP66EzA/edit#gid=2044360518 |
|
|
|
Post by meznoktoz on Jan 8, 2019 21:01:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by meznoktoz on Jan 9, 2019 5:31:18 GMT -5
Det Jim Rothstein has spent a lifetime, on the job and off, investigating the organized child trafficking rings.
Listen at the 12:15 and 18:15 where he explains Human Compromise, then understand how our courts and DOJ and politicians are controlled and silenced. He has some videos dedicated to the subject, highly recommend
Rothstein's take on Weiner's laptop
Listen at 18:25 mark......
At 52:25 He discusses NYPD
|
|
|
|
Post by ninejuanjuan on Jan 9, 2019 7:07:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by The Detail Rack Guy on Jan 9, 2019 12:03:07 GMT -5
The Feds went ballistic when the Times printed this. Agents scurried all over and confiscated what they could. Obviously many copies made it into the possession of the sheep. One of the underaged male "prostitute" was purporte So youre saying 30 years ago Federal agents were confiscating newspapers from newsstands? Really. Do you have any proof of that? There's a ton of proof if you just take a look. This story has been out for a very long while. |
|
|
|
Post by meznoktoz on Jan 11, 2019 23:15:39 GMT -5
Forget the feds confiscating newspapers, stick to the story. Gay underaged human trafficked boys were brought to DC for politicians, while the story was erased by the media, at least low level perp did time. But nothing was done to out the congressmen involved.
|
|
|
|
Post by dustoff262 on Jan 12, 2019 9:04:15 GMT -5
The gay hooker scandal the article described said nothing about underage boys, although runaway teens often found themselves in that service.
By today's standards, the only part of that story would be about paying for sex and not about being gay.
Give it a few years and no one will even care about prostitution. There will be an outcry to legalize it for the tax revenue and to take human trafficking out of the industry. Similar excuses for marijuana legalization.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Detail Rack Guy on Jan 12, 2019 12:12:08 GMT -5
There's a ton of proof if you just take a look. This story has been out for a very long while. Well, you couldn't have looked very hard. There's a whole bunch of evidence in this thread. I think you are being a bit disingenuous. I'm not sure why. |
|
|
|
Post by The Detail Rack Guy on Jan 12, 2019 12:16:56 GMT -5
The Feds went ballistic when the Times printed this. Agents scurried all over and confiscated what they could. Obviously many copies made it into the possession of the sheep. One of the underaged male "prostitute" was purporte So youre saying 30 years ago Federal agents were confiscating newspapers from newsstands? Really. Do you have any proof of that? |
|
|
|
Post by meznoktoz on Jan 13, 2019 7:29:38 GMT -5
Feel free to post evidence of federal agents confiscating newspapers decades ago. I call a mega BULLSHYT on that!! And I told you since I can no longer find the source to disregard it and get back to the very real incident that happened and received little if any coverage and only minor players punished. Did you watch any of the interviews posted here or documentaries? Thoughts? |
|
|
|
Post by The Detail Rack Guy on Jan 13, 2019 10:18:23 GMT -5
You said federal agents seized newspapers. An outlandish claim. You have not been able to back it up. Pedophilia exists but your story is BS. You can sit here and play "gotcha" all you want if it makes you feel better. I remember reading all about this story in the early 1990s. You don't have to believe if you don't want to. That's irrelevant, really. That isn't the point of all this. " Conspiracy of Silence Movie
Conspiracy of Silence was a documentary about child trafficking in the U.S. that was to be shown in the United Kingdom, but it was suppressed by the Discovery Channel. However, a rough-cut of the documentary was leaked, and it has since become an Internet phenomenon." www.franklinscandal.com/
|
|
Elmo334
LER member level 3
home
Posts: 1,329
|
Post by Elmo334 on Jan 13, 2019 13:52:29 GMT -5
Confiscating newspapers would be small potatoes for these guys. Wadman and the FBI: protecting the abusers Besides his national patrons, Larry King was well-pro- tected locally, by Omaha police chief Robert Wadman. Wad- man had been named by Alisha Owen, and other children, as her chief abuser. Owen had repeatedly identified Rusty Nel- son as someone who could prove her charges against Wad- man, King, and others. Under oath to the Senate’s Franklin investigative committee, Wadman was asked about his al- leged “investigation” of Nelson: “We had a situation where we were advised that there was a possibility of child pornography. . . . We investigated it, found the photographer to be, you know, legitimately in- volved in the photography business. . . . The only involve- ment is that this individual had subleased his studio apartment from Larry King, and that was the extent of our investigation into pornography-related activities involving Mr. King in any direct way.” On Oct. 13, 1989, Wadman testified again before the Ne- braska Senate’s Franklin committee, pleading that the FBI looked at the case exactly the same way he did. Said Wadman to the committee’s attorney, John Stevens Berry: “The tough thing with this, Mr. Berry, is that we have the FBI who con- ducts an investigation and basically says the same things that we have said. If the FBI—are they now linked to this cover- up in some way? Should the Justice Department be investi- gated as somehow or another assisting in this ‘cover-up’?” As DeCamp noted drily, in recording this exchange in his book, “Wadman said it, but in this case it’s true.” DeCamp devoted an entire chapter to the FBI’s heinous role in the affair, beginning with the fact that Wadman’s closest friend Damning new evidence implicating George Bush in the child abuse case centered around the Franklin Credit Union in Omaha, Nebraska, is at hand—if a key witness can be kept alive. in Omaha was FBI Special Agent in Charge for Omaha, Nick O’Hara. Among other things, the FBI: • Repeatedly intervened against Franklin committee chief investigator Gary Caradori, to hide or destroy evidence. Caradori and his nine-year-old son were killed on July 11, 1990, when his plane blew up in mid-flight, as he was return- ing to Nebraska with evidence which, he had told associates, “would blow the case wide open.” • Threatenedthechildrenvictim-witnesseswithlongjail terms, if they told the truth, or that they would die mysteri- ously, as did victim-witness Troy Bonor’s brother. • Called Franklin committee Chairman Sen. Loran Schmit and DeCamp in to threaten them, if they continued the investigation. Schmit and DeCamp were interrogated by O’Hara, as if they had perpetrated a crime. This perversion of justice by the FBI continues today, as documented in Nelson’s affidavit (see Documentation). larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1997/eirv24n31-19970801/eirv24n31-19970801_062-explosive_new_developments_in_ne.pdf |
|
|
|
Post by meznoktoz on Jan 13, 2019 15:13:21 GMT -5
Utilizing common sense, we would KNOW that if Federal agents did confiscate newspapers there would be an uproar from the press, 1st Amendment advocates, not to mention newspaper dealers and distributors. You can post all you want about boy fvckers, but this claim is still BS. Classic troll behavior Will fixate on this small detail to attempt to derail the very real incident that happened. |
|
|
|
Post by meznoktoz on Jan 13, 2019 15:13:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by meznoktoz on Jan 13, 2019 15:39:59 GMT -5
Lyndon larouche? You're kidding right? But even that screwball isn't backing up the confiscated newspaper lie. From Nov 2011- the only link apparently left online. A lot of what I linked to in the old RANT has also been removed. Time goes by, people lose interest with their websites and the go down. This is a small part of the story. The real story is underaged male prostitutes, some from the Franklin Scandal, serviced congressmen and others at the White House and the story in the Washington Times was buried, none of the big players ever held accountable. From Ken Adachi, Editor
educate-yourself.org/tg/franklincoverupexcerptwashtimesphoto.shtml
November 18, 2011
The Washington Times, June 29, 1989 (Front page story): Homosexual prositution inquiry ensnares VIPs with Reagan, Bush~Full text (Nov. 18, 2011) The June 29, 1989 issue of The Washington Times newspaper seen below was gathered up and collected from news stands and newspaper vendors in Washington D.C. within an hour of the paper hitting the street. I suspect that the White House, working through the Secret Service, played a leading roll in arranging to have these newspapers recalled. While many web sites have posted a scan of the front page headline seen below, I couldn't find a typed out text of the entire story, so I decided to type out the text myself so more people can read the story. I also included an enlargement of both the front page story and the continuation of the article inside the paper on page A7 for those who want to read the original text as it appeared in the newspaper. (The typed out text of the entire story is seen below the Washington Times front page scan immediately below.) Ken Adachi educate-yourself.org/tg/franklincoverupexcerptwashtimesphoto.shtml |
|
|
|
Post by meznoktoz on Jan 14, 2019 5:18:04 GMT -5
Classic troll behavior Will fixate on this small detail to attempt to derail the very real incident that happened. Pointing out a bald-faced lie makes me a troll? What is posting complete nonsense make you? If pointing out youre nonsense makes me a troll, I wear the banner proudly. Pedophilia is a very serious problem, why muddy the waters with nonesense? There weren't any FBI agents confiscating newspapers, why don't you just admit that you lied and move on? Because I posted three times to ignore the statement and focus on the serious matter of child sex trafficking by elites....but you keep bringing it up. I posted the one statement left I could find online(see above), this story is 30 years old and much has disappeared. I even took the effort to research the Washington Times long term archive, which begin in 1990, the story was from June 1989. So again, I ask, instead of harping on this statement, what are your comments on this story that was buried all those years ago. You see, the press thought they had a bomb and ran with it that first day. They thought this would be disastrous to Reagan. But it was congressmen, Democrat and Republican alike involved, and others with a lot of power. And the story disappeared (although the child sex trafficking ring had minor players jailed) They even prevented the Discovery Channel from airing the documentary years later. The day politicians got caught with child sex trafficking victims AND NO ONE KNOWS ABOUT IT. That is disturbing |
|
|
|
Post by The Detail Rack Guy on Jan 14, 2019 8:17:34 GMT -5
Lyndon larouche? You're kidding right? But even that screwball isn't backing up the confiscated newspaper lie. No, no one is kidding you. Everyone has been patient and tried to explain everything to you, with each post. There is much info that has been shown in this thread, but if you want to wave your hand and pretend that it's all made up from whole cloth, that's up to you. |
|
|
|
Post by The Detail Rack Guy on Jan 14, 2019 9:25:39 GMT -5
You can post all you want about boy fvckers, but this claim is still BS.
Then maybe you could focus on the more important issue here, and move on from there. |
|
|
|
Post by The Detail Rack Guy on Jan 14, 2019 10:41:20 GMT -5
Ok. Ill just forget you posted a lie. And I'll forget you posted a quote from Lyndon LAROUCHE,the original wacky crackpot. (Google him).
In fact Ill be forgetting to read your posts. Obviously you are some sort of wierdo conspiracy nut. We have found LawmanBklyn.  |
|
